After watching this I have realised that at 21:17, where I spoke against prosperity teaching, that I made it sound like Asa's diseased feet had nothing to do with his disobedience to God. I don't think that this is true. Although prosperity teaching is false, and not every illness, trial, or suffering is punishment from God, I think that in the case of king Asa it is entirely probable that his disease came as a result of his disobedience. In hindsight I should have worded that section better, however I though I should leave this comment here so that there is no misunderstanding.